home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: grimsel.zurich.ibm.com!usenet
- From: wgk@zurich.ibm.com (Keith Whittingham)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: malloc() function and new operator
- Date: 9 Apr 1996 14:36:45 GMT
- Organization: IBM Research, ZRH
- Message-ID: <4kdslt$rg1@grimsel.zurich.ibm.com>
- References: <4kbo18$t1s@news.NetVision.net.il> <DpLKGo.MG0@mv.mv.com>
- Reply-To: wgk@zurich.ibm.com
- NNTP-Posting-Host: pine.zurich.ibm.com
- X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 v1.00
-
- In <DpLKGo.MG0@mv.mv.com>, ENGR@GSSI.MV.COM (Michael Furman) writes:
- >Nothing wrong, but I don't see any reason for using
- >malloc/free in C++
-
- To use (fast) realloc()?...
-
- Keith
-
-